G7 Admits Proxy War

G7 LEADERS’ STATEMENT ON GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES

Source: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/edgdrkoo/g7-leaders-statement-on-geopolitical-issues.pdf

If anyone was deluded enough to believe the Ukraine war is about democracy and not simply a proxy war against Russia to bring it to its knees and finish them off as a Great Power, then the G7 June 17th statement will finally kill that delusion:

To support and accelerate this new momentum, we agree to increase the delivery of air defence capacities, additional systems and interceptors, and long-range capabilities. We are also ready to consider extending to Ukraine the benefit of licenses to allow for an increase in Ukraine’s military production.

So nothing can be clearer. It's a serious proxy war that the G7 is running here.

And we are teetering on the brink of a real war as the G7 has fully bought into the false narrative that Russia (i.e. Putin) wants to invade and conquer Europe to satisfy his whacko 'imperial' ambitions.

They also believe that the Russian SMO was a 'full-scale' invasion of Ukraine when it clearly was not.

There were simply not enough Russian troops involved - even the Ukrainian military understood this at the time.

https://en.as.com/en/2022/02/24/latest_news/1645729870_894320.html

The SMO was clearly originally a limited operation to create a buffer zone in eastern Ukraine and to support Russian-speaking Ukrainians who were being persecuted by the Ukranian state (as documented by Benoît Paré and Jacques Baud in their books and summarized by https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/09/19/war-has-never-been-what-it-seems-the-testimony-of-benoit-pare/) because they did not support the result of the Maidan coup that overthrew the government.

So the question is where will this 'accelerated' momentum for the Ukraine war from the G7 lead to?

As attacks on Russia from Ukraine, guided and supplied by NATO, continue to increase then how long can this go on before it triggers a wider conflict?

Presumably this is what the G7 wants by its actions. There simply can be no other explanation.

The New York Times reported that casualty numbers in the Ukraine war have hit 2 million, numbers also discussed by Al-Jazeera.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/27/us/politics/russia-ukraine-casualties.html

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/23/the-ukraine-war-in-numbers-people-territory-money

But can this level of 'body count' really be true?

In the Vietnam war, unverifiable body count numbers were used as simply a propaganda tool to persuade the American people that the USA was winning a war that they eventually lost.

As some context, AI reports :

During World War II, the United Kingdom suffered approximately 383,700 military deaths and 67,100 civilian deaths, totaling around 450,900 casualties.

Are the G7 countries - and their electorates - really ready to assume WW2 levels of casualties (according to the NYT/CSIC figures) from a real 'hot' war with Russia and that's without the use of nuclear weapons or the involvement of another power in the war like China or North Korea?

Do these G7 leaders really know what they are doing with this proxy war?

The mainstream-view baseline is available to subscribers — subscribe (it's free).
An AI editorial comment is available to subscribers — subscribe (it's free).
Interesting?

Get FNN by email

New posts straight to your inbox. Subscribers also see the AI context on each post, such as the mainstream-media view and an editorial comment, and can search and filter the whole archive. It's free, and you can unsubscribe at any time.